kannan
03-27 03:14 PM
Can anybody tell the stages in I 485 approval.
Backround check
previous status in this country
Medical
what else they check during this stage?
Backround check
previous status in this country
Medical
what else they check during this stage?
wallpaper styles for long hair 2010.
imm_pro
02-28 07:16 PM
DEC 07 PD is current ..??? which category are you in.
nivasch
10-04 03:26 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061004/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_homeland_security_bill_3;_ylt=ArlHIZrz622DuOU 5kr13It1Quk0A;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCU l
2011 girlfriend Wedding Hair Styles
CRAZYMONK
03-17 02:53 PM
Ram,
I just sent a PM. pls check
I just sent a PM. pls check
more...
toosunneo
01-31 01:18 PM
I would appreciate if someone could answer the following question. Before I ask my question, below is a brief background:
- H-1b Date Started: October 2005
- Current H-1b expiration: August 2010 (when I switched my last job in August 2007, they extended for 3 years)
- Date of filing labor: January 10, 2010
- Time outside US on H-1b: about 90 days.
My attorney at work said that I would still need approximately another two months (comfortably) of time outside of the US that they can recapture. This extension would take me into late January 2011, more than one year past the point of the PERM filing. They can, at that point, apply for a 'seventh year' H-1B extension based on my PERM process having been pending for more than one year.
Here is my question. Since I am currently in my fifth year of my h-1b, would it be possible now to apply for the sixth year of h-1b visa until October 2011 instead of looking at seventh year? I started my h-1b in October 2005. Therefore, I have until six years before my h-1b visa can expire, is that correct? If this is not correct, I would appreciate if anyone has any other suggestions to avoid travelling for 2 months out of US prior to July 2010.
Thank you.
- H-1b Date Started: October 2005
- Current H-1b expiration: August 2010 (when I switched my last job in August 2007, they extended for 3 years)
- Date of filing labor: January 10, 2010
- Time outside US on H-1b: about 90 days.
My attorney at work said that I would still need approximately another two months (comfortably) of time outside of the US that they can recapture. This extension would take me into late January 2011, more than one year past the point of the PERM filing. They can, at that point, apply for a 'seventh year' H-1B extension based on my PERM process having been pending for more than one year.
Here is my question. Since I am currently in my fifth year of my h-1b, would it be possible now to apply for the sixth year of h-1b visa until October 2011 instead of looking at seventh year? I started my h-1b in October 2005. Therefore, I have until six years before my h-1b visa can expire, is that correct? If this is not correct, I would appreciate if anyone has any other suggestions to avoid travelling for 2 months out of US prior to July 2010.
Thank you.
munnu77
02-15 01:42 AM
Hello Guys,
I lost my job last week and we have decided to return back to India.
Filed 2 times for GC and got stalled for some reason or another. I am on my 7th year extension. We decided to go back due to frustrtion of Immi. policies and other personel reasons.
I was one of the first 500 members in immigrationvoice.com.(but was not so actively involved)
Still remember those days in 2005, I was an active member of another website callled us immigration america travel news at isnamerica.org (http://www.isnamerica.org). (new members might not know abt this site)
I was very critical of IV during it was formed, but became a member after I got a call from one of the founders of IV.(dont remember who?)
Anyway, Good luck to all you guys.....And Wish u all success.
I have a Q
Does anybody know, how much money you can take to India when you travel? I am travelling with my wife. So i guess each person can take so much? Cash, Travellers check?
If anybody give me a website, i would appreciate it.
Thank you
I lost my job last week and we have decided to return back to India.
Filed 2 times for GC and got stalled for some reason or another. I am on my 7th year extension. We decided to go back due to frustrtion of Immi. policies and other personel reasons.
I was one of the first 500 members in immigrationvoice.com.(but was not so actively involved)
Still remember those days in 2005, I was an active member of another website callled us immigration america travel news at isnamerica.org (http://www.isnamerica.org). (new members might not know abt this site)
I was very critical of IV during it was formed, but became a member after I got a call from one of the founders of IV.(dont remember who?)
Anyway, Good luck to all you guys.....And Wish u all success.
I have a Q
Does anybody know, how much money you can take to India when you travel? I am travelling with my wife. So i guess each person can take so much? Cash, Travellers check?
If anybody give me a website, i would appreciate it.
Thank you
more...
infofana
11-12 07:16 AM
I've received an answer in the WPF forum :
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/wpf/thread/70e5bace-be65-422d-b4d7-7a4e7a866837
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/wpf/thread/70e5bace-be65-422d-b4d7-7a4e7a866837
2010 2011 hair Wedding Hairstyles
DSLStart
06-26 10:45 AM
I guess it must be Nebraska, as my 131 was approved by TSC about a month ago and the status is still case pending...
Is it at Texas or Nebraska?
Is it at Texas or Nebraska?
more...
jliechty
June 18th, 2005, 04:14 AM
In general, macro lenses around 100mm are good for most kinds of macro photography. They have too much working distance for use on a copy stand, and not quite enough for skittish and/or dangerous insects or small animals. For general purpose stuff, the angle of view is such that you get enough background isolation to be worthwhile (you can rotate around your subject just a bit to get a highlight out of the background, while a 50mm macro takes in more background and makes this difficult).
I got a used Tamron 90mm, and let's just say that the build quality does not inspire confidence - however, the image quality is excellent. From what little I've seen of the Sigma 105mm macro (and from the many images that the members here have posted), it appears to have a bit better build quality and fine image quality as well. The Nikon macro is not going to be much better, if at all, in image quality than these, and you will pay dearly for the brand name. The one macro lens to avoid, however, is a "Phoenix" macro that only goes to 1:2 (that means that you can't get enough magnification for most small insects and flowers to fill the frame) and is most likely more cheaply built than my Tamron. Almost every other macro lens goes to 1:1 these days, and you can get the nicer ones used from KEH for not much more, so there's no reason to buy not-so-ideal lenses that you'll outgrow in no time anyway.
I got a used Tamron 90mm, and let's just say that the build quality does not inspire confidence - however, the image quality is excellent. From what little I've seen of the Sigma 105mm macro (and from the many images that the members here have posted), it appears to have a bit better build quality and fine image quality as well. The Nikon macro is not going to be much better, if at all, in image quality than these, and you will pay dearly for the brand name. The one macro lens to avoid, however, is a "Phoenix" macro that only goes to 1:2 (that means that you can't get enough magnification for most small insects and flowers to fill the frame) and is most likely more cheaply built than my Tamron. Almost every other macro lens goes to 1:1 these days, and you can get the nicer ones used from KEH for not much more, so there's no reason to buy not-so-ideal lenses that you'll outgrow in no time anyway.